tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9101917425752696234.post3373319399871448785..comments2023-10-15T06:10:02.124-07:00Comments on @GamerChick42: On Second Thought...Unknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9101917425752696234.post-16033573855508722712011-11-25T18:40:50.194-08:002011-11-25T18:40:50.194-08:00There are some who would argue that FW is too much...There are some who would argue that FW is too much reward to too "optional" of risk. I would argue that lowsec, in general (outside of FW), is too much risk for too little reward.<br />So carebears want easy ISK from relatively "easy" faction goods/LP with little actual risk? Too. Damn. Bad.<br />I am very much sick and tired of hearing about risk and how things should be made "safer", especially as regards hisec, but it applies in this instance too.<br />Personally I find it sickening that a bear can just run L4s AFK "perfectly safe" in hisec, whilst I run anoms and (DED) plexes in low, having to constantly watch local, spam dirscan, and be on a high level of vigilance....and make MORE than me, easily. Especially when you calculate the decision of 1) leaving an anom/plex and having it despawn or someone else finish it, or 2) stay and fight, probably get 'dropped, and now not only have I not made the $$ for the anom/plex, but I've lost about 15% of the actual hull value, but cost of fittings, and maybe even the cost of implants!<br />And bears whine about "risk" in hisec. Hah. As a former "bear" myself: fuck em.Hong WeiLohhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14702284760088727892noreply@blogger.com